Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 34, Issue 35, November 2013, Pages 8941-8948
Biomaterials

Mn2+-doped silica nanoparticles for hepatocyte-targeted detection of liver cancer in T1-weighted MRI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

With an aim to examine the possibility of developing a liver-specific MRI contrast agent that takes advantages of brightly enhanced MR images by Mn2+ whilst making up the limitations of the pre-developed contrast agent, the Mn2+-doped SiO2 nanoparticles (Mn–SiO2) were synthesized and their characteristics as MR contrast agents were investigated. The in vitro and in vivo investigations showed that Mn–SiO2 has unique MR contrast-enhancing characteristics that activate positive contrast enhancement in T1-weighted MR images only under low pH conditions by liberating Mn2+ ions from MR inactive nanoparticles. The administration of Mn–SiO2 to an orthotopic xenograft model of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resulted in a differentiation of enhancement periods between HCC and normal parenchyma tissues on T1-weighted MR images and consequently presented the duplicates of the highly contrast-enhanced liver image with an equal liver-to-HCC contrast ratio but opposite contrast. The Mn–SiO2-enhanced MR imaging therefore allowed for the repetitive detection of the HCC within a single MR imaging session, which can help us to achieve more reliable diagnosis and characterization of liver lesions than is possible with any currently used Mn2+-based contrast agent. In addition, the in vivo biodistribution study also supported the effectiveness of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles as a liver-specific MRI contrast agent, which efficiently delivers and releases the T1-contrasting Mn2+ ions to targeted hepatocytes.

Introduction

The use of contrast agents in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging improves the detection of liver lesions by increasing the lesion-to-liver contrast and, in some situations, facilitating the lesion characterization [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Non-specific extracellular fluid (ECF) agents, that rely on differential blood flow of paramagnetic Gd3+ chelate complexes (Gd) between liver and lesion, have been the most widely employed contrast agents for liver MR imaging [6], [7], [8]. However, even well-performed dynamic MR imaging using ECF agents often requires difficult operations, such as rapid imaging acquisition and highly accurate initiation timing. Of even greater concern is the possibility of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) resulting from the presence of dechelated Gd3+ ions [9], [10]. Recently, liver-specific contrast agents such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP), which target the main cell populations of the liver, were developed to overcome the limitations of ECF agents. SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, which exploits the preferential uptake of SPIOs into a normal liver via Kupffer cells, was once employed in liver diagnosis using T2-weighted MR imaging [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. However, these agents are no longer clinically used, likely owing to a number of drawbacks, including ambiguity in distinguishing a hypointense contrast effect by the SPIOs from that of bleeding or calcifications [18]. MnDPDP was developed as a hepatobiliary contrast agent that is taken up by hepatocytes and excreted in bile. [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] The intravenously administrated MnDPDPs are transmetallated by Zn2+ ions in the bloodstream and release the free Mn2+ ions [25]. The Mn2+ ions are then taken up by hepatocytes, resulting in a hyperintense signal-intensity change on T1-weighted MR images. The MnDPDP-enhanced MR imaging is known to be advantageous in characterizing lesions as hepatocellular or non-hepatocellular. Whereas, because any hepatocellular tissues, including lesions, are enhanced in a similar time course, by the non-specifically incorporated Mn2+ ions, the MnDPDP-enhanced MRI usually does not give a high lesion-to-liver contrast ratio. In terms of toxicity, the increased blood concentration of free Mn2+ ions, which interfere with myocardial processing of Ca2+, may result in a toxic effect on the cardiovascular and brain systems [26], [27].

The aim of the present study was to examine the possibility of developing a liver-specific MRI contrast agent that takes advantages of brightly enhanced MR images by Mn2+, without the limitations of the pre-developed MnDPDP (Teslascan). For this purpose, we incorporated Mn2+ ions in an amorphous SiO2 nanoparticle, which is generally considered safe by the U. S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) [28], [29], by using a pH-responsive material that liberates Mn2+ ions only under acidic conditions [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. It was hypothesized that the engulfment of the Mn2+-doped SiO2 (Mn–SiO2) nanoparticles in acidic endosomal vesicles by Kupffer cells would trigger the release of Mn2+ ions [35], [36], enhancing normal liver tissues with a high density of Kupffer cells over lesions, which are devoid of Kupffer cells, on T1-weighted MR imaging. Therefore, the administration of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles may lead to the time-sequential signal enhancement of normal and lesion tissues, enhancing their contrast ratio and improving the lesion visibility in liver MR imaging. In addition, the use of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles may allow for efficient, targeted delivery of a contrast agent to the liver, without releasing the potentially toxic Mn2+ ions in the nearby neutral bloodstream.

Section snippets

General consideration

Any reagent including MnSO4·5H2O (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd.), Igepal CO-520 (Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Acros), NH4OH (Samchun Chem.), and 2-[methoxy(polyethyleneoxy)-propyl]9–12-trimethoxysilane (MPEOPS, Gelest, Inc.) was used as purchased without any purification. Analyses of FE-TEM were conducted with JEOL JEM-2100F. SEM images were captured with a XL30S FEG field-emission scanning electron microscope (Philips electron optics, Netherlands). X-Ray diffraction patterns were

Preparation of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles

The incorporation of Mn2+ ions in the silica nanosphere was conducted through modification of the reverse microemulsion technique [37]. In the modified technique, a microemulsion system containing Mn2+ ions in water droplets was generated via injection of a MnSO4 aqueous solution into a cyclohexane solution containing polyoxyethylenenonylphenyl ether (Igepal CO-520, containing 50 mol% hydrophilic groups). Silica formation was then initiated through successive addition of a NH4OH solution and

Conclusion

The ability of the Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles, in which paramagnetic Mn2+ ions are doped in a SiO2 nanosphere, to act as a liver-specific MR imaging agent owing to a pH-responsive magnetic relaxation property was evaluated. The in vitro and in vivo investigations showed that Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles have unique MR contrast-enhancing characteristics that activate positive contrast enhancement in T1-weighted MR images only under low pH conditions by liberating Mn2+ ions from MR inactive nanoparticles.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (2011-0017377) (I. S. L.) and (2010-0029410) (J. H. L.).

References (42)

  • A. Louie

    Multimodality imaging probes: design and challenges

    Chem Rev

    (2010)
  • J. Ward

    Use of contrast agents for liver MRI

    Radiography

    (2007)
  • G. Morana et al.

    Contrast agents for hepatic MRI

    Cancer Imaging

    (2007)
  • S.N. Gandhi et al.

    MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how

    Radiographics

    (2006)
  • Z. Zhou et al.

    Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance cancer imaging

    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol

    (2013)
  • M.F. Bellin et al.

    Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media

    Eur Radiol

    (2003)
  • P.H. Kuo et al.

    Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

    Radiology

    (2007)
  • T.D. Schladt et al.

    Synthesis and bio-functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles for medical diagnosis and treatment

    Dalton Trans

    (2011)
  • H.B. Na et al.

    Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents

    Adv Mater

    (2009)
  • S. Laurent et al.

    Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications

    Chem Rev

    (2008)
  • J. Huang et al.

    Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles

    ACS Nano

    (2010)
  • Cited by (54)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text