Mn2+-doped silica nanoparticles for hepatocyte-targeted detection of liver cancer in T1-weighted MRI
Introduction
The use of contrast agents in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging improves the detection of liver lesions by increasing the lesion-to-liver contrast and, in some situations, facilitating the lesion characterization [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Non-specific extracellular fluid (ECF) agents, that rely on differential blood flow of paramagnetic Gd3+ chelate complexes (Gd) between liver and lesion, have been the most widely employed contrast agents for liver MR imaging [6], [7], [8]. However, even well-performed dynamic MR imaging using ECF agents often requires difficult operations, such as rapid imaging acquisition and highly accurate initiation timing. Of even greater concern is the possibility of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) resulting from the presence of dechelated Gd3+ ions [9], [10]. Recently, liver-specific contrast agents such as superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP), which target the main cell populations of the liver, were developed to overcome the limitations of ECF agents. SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, which exploits the preferential uptake of SPIOs into a normal liver via Kupffer cells, was once employed in liver diagnosis using T2-weighted MR imaging [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. However, these agents are no longer clinically used, likely owing to a number of drawbacks, including ambiguity in distinguishing a hypointense contrast effect by the SPIOs from that of bleeding or calcifications [18]. MnDPDP was developed as a hepatobiliary contrast agent that is taken up by hepatocytes and excreted in bile. [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24] The intravenously administrated MnDPDPs are transmetallated by Zn2+ ions in the bloodstream and release the free Mn2+ ions [25]. The Mn2+ ions are then taken up by hepatocytes, resulting in a hyperintense signal-intensity change on T1-weighted MR images. The MnDPDP-enhanced MR imaging is known to be advantageous in characterizing lesions as hepatocellular or non-hepatocellular. Whereas, because any hepatocellular tissues, including lesions, are enhanced in a similar time course, by the non-specifically incorporated Mn2+ ions, the MnDPDP-enhanced MRI usually does not give a high lesion-to-liver contrast ratio. In terms of toxicity, the increased blood concentration of free Mn2+ ions, which interfere with myocardial processing of Ca2+, may result in a toxic effect on the cardiovascular and brain systems [26], [27].
The aim of the present study was to examine the possibility of developing a liver-specific MRI contrast agent that takes advantages of brightly enhanced MR images by Mn2+, without the limitations of the pre-developed MnDPDP (Teslascan). For this purpose, we incorporated Mn2+ ions in an amorphous SiO2 nanoparticle, which is generally considered safe by the U. S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) [28], [29], by using a pH-responsive material that liberates Mn2+ ions only under acidic conditions [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. It was hypothesized that the engulfment of the Mn2+-doped SiO2 (Mn–SiO2) nanoparticles in acidic endosomal vesicles by Kupffer cells would trigger the release of Mn2+ ions [35], [36], enhancing normal liver tissues with a high density of Kupffer cells over lesions, which are devoid of Kupffer cells, on T1-weighted MR imaging. Therefore, the administration of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles may lead to the time-sequential signal enhancement of normal and lesion tissues, enhancing their contrast ratio and improving the lesion visibility in liver MR imaging. In addition, the use of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles may allow for efficient, targeted delivery of a contrast agent to the liver, without releasing the potentially toxic Mn2+ ions in the nearby neutral bloodstream.
Section snippets
General consideration
Any reagent including MnSO4·5H2O (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd.), Igepal CO-520 (Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Acros), NH4OH (Samchun Chem.), and 2-[methoxy(polyethyleneoxy)-propyl]9–12-trimethoxysilane (MPEOPS, Gelest, Inc.) was used as purchased without any purification. Analyses of FE-TEM were conducted with JEOL JEM-2100F. SEM images were captured with a XL30S FEG field-emission scanning electron microscope (Philips electron optics, Netherlands). X-Ray diffraction patterns were
Preparation of Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles
The incorporation of Mn2+ ions in the silica nanosphere was conducted through modification of the reverse microemulsion technique [37]. In the modified technique, a microemulsion system containing Mn2+ ions in water droplets was generated via injection of a MnSO4 aqueous solution into a cyclohexane solution containing polyoxyethylenenonylphenyl ether (Igepal CO-520, containing 50 mol% hydrophilic groups). Silica formation was then initiated through successive addition of a NH4OH solution and
Conclusion
The ability of the Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles, in which paramagnetic Mn2+ ions are doped in a SiO2 nanosphere, to act as a liver-specific MR imaging agent owing to a pH-responsive magnetic relaxation property was evaluated. The in vitro and in vivo investigations showed that Mn–SiO2 nanoparticles have unique MR contrast-enhancing characteristics that activate positive contrast enhancement in T1-weighted MR images only under low pH conditions by liberating Mn2+ ions from MR inactive nanoparticles.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (2011-0017377) (I. S. L.) and (2010-0029410) (J. H. L.).
References (42)
- et al.
Small molecular gadolinium(III) complexes as MRI contrast agents for diagnostic imaging
Coord Chem Rev
(2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadolinium based contrast agents: a summary of the medical literature reporting
Eur J Radiol
(2008)- et al.
Application of superparamagnetic iron oxide to imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma
Eur J Radiol
(2006) - et al.
Recent advances in iron oxide nanocrystal technology for medical imaging
Adv Drug Deliv Rev
(2006) - et al.
Manganese-based MRI contrast agents: past, present, and future
Tetrahedron
(2011) - et al.
MnDPDP enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions
Clin Radiol
(2002) - et al.
Manganese oxide-based multifunctionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-responsive MRI, ultrasonography and circumvention of MDR in cancer cells
Biomaterials
(2012) - et al.
Fe3O4/MnO hybrid nanocrystals as a dual contrast agent for both T1- and T2-weighted liver MRI
Biomaterials
(2013) - et al.
In vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of silica nanoparticles as a function of geometry, porosity and surface characteristics
J Control Release
(2012) - et al.
Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance imaging
Chem Rev
(2010)
Multimodality imaging probes: design and challenges
Chem Rev
Use of contrast agents for liver MRI
Radiography
Contrast agents for hepatic MRI
Cancer Imaging
MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how
Radiographics
Gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance cancer imaging
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol
Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media
Eur Radiol
Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis
Radiology
Synthesis and bio-functionalization of magnetic nanoparticles for medical diagnosis and treatment
Dalton Trans
Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents
Adv Mater
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications
Chem Rev
Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles
ACS Nano
Cited by (54)
Recent progress in design and surface modification of manganese nanoparticles for MRI contrasting and therapy
2023, Chemical Engineering JournalMn-dox metal-organic nanoparticles for cancer therapy and magnetic resonance imaging
2022, Dyes and PigmentsMesoporous silica nanoparticle: Heralding a brighter future in cancer nanomedicine
2021, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials